All evidence below is fictional training material. Confidence describes what each source supports, not independent verification of a real event. Supporting passages are precise paraphrases, not quotations.

| Claim | Type | Source and publication date | Supporting passage, paraphrased | Confidence | Contradictions or tension | Unknown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Registration was announced to open on 12 September. | Official announcement within the fictional scenario | S1, simulated project announcement, 2026-09-01 | Paper Lantern's stated registration opening is 12 September. | High for the announced date; insufficient for actual opening | S2 reports a submission accepted on 11 September. | Whether the announced date was changed; actual public opening time; year/time zone are not explicit in the passage. |
| A form reportedly accepted a submission on 11 September. | Reported observation | S2, organizer field observation, 2026-09-03 | The observer says they saw a submission accepted on 11 September and did not check if it was a rehearsal. | Limited: unverified observation with a chronology problem | The claimed observation date is later than S2's publication date if both refer to September 2026; also earlier than S1's announced opening. | Correct publication/event date, year, whether rehearsal, and whether acceptance meant public registration was open. |
| Workshop capacity is 24 people. | Official announced fact within the scenario | S1, 2026-09-01 | The workshop can accommodate 24 participants. | High for announced capacity | No contradiction supplied | Remaining places and actual attendance; capacity does not establish eligibility. |
| Attendance availability beyond the local community was undecided. | Official status within the scenario | S1, 2026-09-01 | Whether people outside the local community may participate has not been settled. | High for status on the announcement date | No later eligibility decision supplied | Final eligibility, definition of the local community, and other admission conditions; the passage does not guarantee admission to every local resident. |
| One interviewee prefers evenings and reports one friend asking about evening availability. | Anecdote; friend's interest is secondhand | S3, participant interview, 2026-09-04 | The speaker would prefer an evening session, knows of a friend's inquiry, and does not know the timetable. | High that the preference was reported; low as evidence of broad demand | No conflicting preference supplied, but no corroboration or sample frame either | Friend's actual preference, wider demand, willingness to attend and actual timetable. |
| Evening demand is not established by these materials. | Evidence-bounded inference | S3, 2026-09-04; no demand study in S1 or S2 | One preference and one reported inquiry cannot establish population-level demand. | High for insufficiency of the supplied evidence | Does not contradict the existence of some evening interest | A broader, defined sample and attendance intent by time slot are needed. |

Registration was **announced for 12 September**, but its actual opening cannot be established: S2's 11 September report may involve rehearsal and has an unresolved publication/event chronology. Eligibility outside the local community was **undecided**, and no complete eligibility policy is supplied. Evening interest appears in one interview, but **evening demand is not established**. None of these gaps should be silently resolved.