GPT 6 frontend QA

LOCAL TRAINING FIXTURE. This deliberately introduced clear-search defect is not a production-site finding.

15 templates

Task
Turn competing commitments into a humane weekly plan.

Instructions
Plan my week from [COMMITMENTS], [FIXED EVENTS], [ENERGY PATTERN], and [ONE PRIORITY]. Separate fixed events from flexible work. Protect meals, sleep, and transition time. Offer a first draft, then list the two tradeoffs that matter most. Do not invent availability.

Expected output
A day-by-day table, assumptions, and two questions before any schedule is treated as final.

Checks
- All fixed events appear once.
- The plan contains buffers.
- Unknown availability is labeled.

Task
Compare a small set of personal options without false precision.

Instructions
Help me decide between [OPTIONS] for [GOAL]. Use these criteria and weights: [CRITERIA]. Ask only for missing information that could change the ranking. Show evidence, assumptions, downside, and a reversible next step. Do not present a score as an objective truth.

Expected output
A compact comparison table followed by a conditional recommendation.

Checks
- Weights are visible.
- Evidence and inference are separated.
- The next step is reversible.

Task
Create an accurate explanation for a specified reader.

Instructions
Explain [IDEA] to [AUDIENCE] who already knows [PRIOR KNOWLEDGE]. Start with a one-sentence answer, then use one concrete example and one boundary case. Define necessary terms. Mark uncertainty and avoid a claim stronger than the evidence.

Expected output
Answer, example, boundary case, and a short “what this does not mean” section.

Checks
- The audience is respected.
- Every technical term is defined.
- Limits are explicit.

Task
Convert messy meeting notes into accountable follow-up.

Instructions
Process these meeting notes: [NOTES]. Extract decisions, open questions, action items, owner, due date, and dependencies. Preserve uncertainty when the notes do not assign an owner or date. Quote a short source phrase for each decision.

Expected output
Decisions, action table, unresolved questions, and a follow-up message draft.

Checks
- No owner is invented.
- Dates are copied or marked unknown.
- Decisions are traceable to notes.

Task
Adapt one update for different readers while retaining facts.

Instructions
Rewrite [UPDATE] for [STAKEHOLDER TYPES]. Keep factual content stable. For each audience, lead with the decision or impact, then risks, required action, and timing. Keep unknowns visible and flag any sentence that needs confirmation.

Expected output
One version per audience plus a shared fact ledger.

Checks
- Facts do not drift between versions.
- Audience specific actions are clear.
- Claims requiring a source are identified.

Task
Make a repeatable checklist from a narrative procedure.

Instructions
Convert [PROCESS DESCRIPTION] into a checklist for [ROLE]. Include prerequisites, ordered steps, decision points, evidence to retain, and a stop condition. Separate required controls from helpful suggestions. Do not fill gaps with assumptions.

Expected output
A numbered checklist, decision tree in prose, and evidence record fields.

Checks
- Prerequisites come first.
- Stop conditions are visible.
- Each control has evidence.

Task
Organize research claims and the sources that support them.

Instructions
Build a source matrix for [QUESTION]. Use only the supplied sources: [SOURCES]. For each claim, record source, publication date, exact supporting passage in your own words, confidence, contradictions, and what remains unknown. Distinguish official fact, reported observation, inference, and anecdote.

Expected output
Claim matrix followed by a short evidence-bounded answer.

Checks
- Every claim has a source or is labeled inference.
- Dates are recorded.
- Conflicts are not silently resolved.

Task
Find patterns in interview notes without turning anecdotes into statistics.

Instructions
Synthesize these interviews: [TRANSCRIPTS]. Group observations by job, pain, workaround, desired outcome, and contradiction. Include representative paraphrases with interview IDs. Count only the supplied interviews and label the sample as directional, not representative.

Expected output
Theme table, counterexamples, opportunity hypotheses, and follow-up questions.

Checks
- Interview IDs are retained.
- No prevalence claim exceeds the sample.
- Counterevidence is included.

Task
Produce a current, source linked comparison for a purchase or policy choice.

Instructions
Compare [OPTIONS] for [USE CASE] using current primary sources where available. Record price date, eligibility, limits, region, and important exclusions. Keep observed facts separate from your recommendation. If a page is dynamic or inaccessible, identify the missing field and the source needed to complete it.

Expected output
Comparison table, evidence notes, unknowns, and a conditional recommendation.

Checks
- Region and date are explicit.
- Price is not treated as permanent.
- Missing comparison fields are identified.

Task
Review a diff for correctness, regressions, and missing verification.

Instructions
Review this diff for [REPOSITORY CONTEXT]: [DIFF]. Prioritize user impact, correctness, security, data loss, compatibility, and test gaps. Cite file and line. Do not praise style unless it affects behavior. If behavior cannot be established from the diff, state what must be checked.

Expected output
Findings ordered by severity, questions, and a focused verification plan.

Checks
- Findings are actionable.
- Severity reflects impact and likelihood.
- Unknown behavior is not asserted.

Task
Turn a bug report into a minimal diagnostic plan.

Instructions
Diagnose [BUG REPORT] in [STACK]. First restate the observable symptom and expected behavior. List competing hypotheses, the cheapest discriminating check for each, required logs, and a minimal reproduction. Do not implement a fix until the failing behavior is isolated.

Expected output
Symptom, hypotheses, ordered checks, reproduction, and evidence needed.

Checks
- Expected behavior is explicit.
- Checks distinguish hypotheses.
- No fix is claimed without evidence.

Task
Specify an API boundary that clients can implement and test.

Instructions
Draft a contract for [ENDPOINT] serving [CLIENTS]. Include request, response, errors, authentication assumptions, idempotency, pagination, limits, compatibility, and examples. Mark every decision that still requires product or security approval. Avoid inventing provider behavior.

Expected output
Contract table, examples, error semantics, and unresolved decisions.

Checks
- Success and failure shapes are complete.
- Security assumptions are stated.
- Open decisions are tagged.

Task
Explore distinct creative directions under a clear brief.

Instructions
Develop [NUMBER] distinct concepts for [PROJECT] aimed at [AUDIENCE]. Constraints: [CONSTRAINTS]. For each, give premise, emotional effect, visual or structural device, risk, and a small first test. Avoid near duplicates and avoid claiming that an untested concept will perform.

Expected output
Concept cards followed by a recommendation for the next test.

Checks
- Concepts differ in mechanism.
- Constraints are honored.
- Performance claims are hypotheses.

Task
Turn an idea into a paced short-form script.

Instructions
Outline a [DURATION] script about [IDEA] for [AUDIENCE]. Include hook, setup, escalation, turn, ending, visual or audio cues, and a single call to action. Keep the voice [VOICE]. Offer two alternate openings and explain the tradeoff in each.

Expected output
Beat sheet, draft script, alternate openings, and production notes.

Checks
- Timing is plausible.
- The turn follows from setup.
- The CTA is singular and clear.

Task
Revise creative work while preserving its intended voice.

Instructions
Edit [DRAFT] against this brief: [BRIEF]. Return a clean revision and a change log grouped by clarity, rhythm, audience fit, factual risk, and voice. Keep lines that already work. Flag brief conflicts instead of silently choosing one interpretation.

Expected output
Revised draft, concise change log, and questions for the owner.

Checks
- Voice remains recognizable.
- Changes map to the brief.
- Factual risks are called out.